Name: Pulp Fiction
Director: Quentin Tarantino
Date Released: 21 October 1994 (UK)
Made in: USA
Awards: Won Oscar. Another 43 wins & 40 nominations
Overall as a film, Pulp Fiction has many of the codes and conventions of a thriller. For instance, the majority of scenes are in unglamorous settings, and the themes in the film include identity, gangster crime, drugs and sex.
I will be discussing two scenes that represent this thriller influence, ‘Mia’s adrenalin shot’ and ‘Butch, in taxi after fight', and the film as a whole and how it has influenced the thriller genre.
Mia's adrenalin shot...
(Vincent finds Mia after she has overdosed and drives her to his dealer’s house for help. They decide to give her an adrenalin shot but neither have done this before.)
Tarantino uses an extreme close up of two hands on the syringe, and this zooms to an even further close up of the needle of the syringe. This helps to build tension and scare the audience. There is then a point of view high angle shot of Mia unconscious. Tarantino uses a close up of the red magic marker blotch (used to show where the needle will be inserted) on Mia’s heart/bust. This red colour signifies danger. This scene objectifies Mia, and causes her to appear vulnerable, as we literally know where her heart is. Mia also appears as exposed, as her shirt has been ripped open and her underwear is revealed. It also signifies Mia’s deviance and her sexuality.
Tarantino uses a countdown to three to increase the tension: 1) close up of Mia’s bloody face, Vincent panting, zoom into face, needle. 2) Two men’s faces, extreme close up of pen mark. 3) Close up of Vincent’s face, raised hand.
As the needle is stabbed into Mia, she awakes and there is a close up of her face as her eyes open wide and she screams. This helps to shock the audience, as the shot is so quick in contrast to the slow countdown.
Butch, in taxi after fight.
Tarantino uses a black and white background outside of the taxi as an inter-textual reference to film noir. Tarantino uses gender reversal, as the taxi driver is female. The driver (Esmeralda) is a typical femme fatale. Men killing men intrigue her and her appearance is very sexual. She is also surrounded by smoke (this can also be seen in female characters in other thrillers, such as Fight Club).
Tarantino raises the issue of Butch’s identity in this scene. Tarantino uses the sentence “I’m an American honey, our names don’t mean shit”. This shows that Butch feels he has a lack of an individual identity and his only identity is that he is an American.
Esmeralda is a more contemporary representation of a femme fatale. She is similar to the ‘Buffy’ (the vampire slayer) character in that she represents contemporary women, for example her tradionally masculine job (taxi driver). Her words are darker and in some ways less obviously sexual than, for example, Mia’s (for instance, “So what does it feel like to kill a man with your bare hands? It's a topic I'm very interested in.”). Esmeralda’s costume is less sexual than Mia’s. Her character represents an independant woman who still maintains her sexuality. She also has the mystery of a femme fatale, for example she says she is from Columbia, which is a referral to cocaine as it is where it is mostly made. Mia is a contrast to many of the original femme fatales and shows the way feminism has changed the way women can be presented.
The film as a whole
The whole film is extremely modern for its time, especially when it's pop culture and cinematic references are considered. The (non-linear) unconventional structure has helped it lead to being named one of the most influental postmodernist influences in cinema. Tarantino used this film to influence many others, such as Reserviour dogs (Vincent from pulp fiction is brothers with Vic "mr. Blonde" Vega, and Tarantino uses the fictional resturant 'Big Kuhuna Burger' in both films. There are similar links to 'Jackie Brown', for instance Jackie Brown wears exactly the same suit as Mia's and drives the same model Honda as Butch.
Tuesday, 13 January 2009
G321 preliminary task shot list.
Shot 1: Medium close up of two main characters.
Shot 2: Long shot of the two main characters walking down the corridoor. zooms out.
Shot 3: Close up through the doors
Shot 4: Long shot of the two characters from behind when they go through the door.
Shot 5: Long shot of characters from in front (continuity).
Shot 6: Low angle medium shot of characters going into the classroom.
Shot 7: Birds eye view shot of the characters going into the classroom.
Shot 8: Camera zooms out to show the characters walking to the desk.
Shot 9: Camera pans as the characters sit down at the desk.
Shot 10: Over the head shot while characters argue, close up of face.
Shot 11: Long shot showing the characters looking at each other
Shot 12: Birds eye view shot as one of the characters walks out.
Shot 2: Long shot of the two main characters walking down the corridoor. zooms out.
Shot 3: Close up through the doors
Shot 4: Long shot of the two characters from behind when they go through the door.
Shot 5: Long shot of characters from in front (continuity).
Shot 6: Low angle medium shot of characters going into the classroom.
Shot 7: Birds eye view shot of the characters going into the classroom.
Shot 8: Camera zooms out to show the characters walking to the desk.
Shot 9: Camera pans as the characters sit down at the desk.
Shot 10: Over the head shot while characters argue, close up of face.
Shot 11: Long shot showing the characters looking at each other
Shot 12: Birds eye view shot as one of the characters walks out.
Tuesday, 6 January 2009
G321 preliminary filming task evaluation
G321 preliminary filming task
1) what techniques and codes did you use in your film and how do they influence the audiences understanding of the film?
In our film we used the 180-degree rule (that two characters must have the same right to left relationship) to help our audience to understand the action better, avoid confusion of the two characters, and keep our film looking professional. We used close ups and the faces to make the reactions clearer and to make the action more intense. We shot the girls close together and holding hands at the beginning of the film, but opposite each other and further away when they argue.
We used shot reverse shot when one character looked at another, and then we filmed from over the other characters shoulder to create the idea they were looking back at the other. This was also useful when we filmed different reactions of each character and could edit it to look like it was one shot.
We used Match on action when filming our characters walking through two double doors. First we filmed behind the characters and then in front of them as they entered through the doors. It was difficult to make this accurate, as everything had to be in the right place.
These three techniques help the film look continuous and make sense to the audience.
2) How did you use new technologies in your construction, planning and evaluation, and what skills do you have at using this technology?
When planning, we uploaded our story boards (through a scanner) to our blogs. Whilst constructing our Preliminary Filming Task we used digital cameras, which helped us look back at what we filmed and film over things.
We used non-linear editing software to cut scenes we didn’t want to use and blend our shots. This took a lot of practice but now we have gained more independence when using them.
We used YouTube and our blogs to upload the film.
We also developed the skills of using a steady (instead of shaky) camera and using a variety of different shot types (including practising high angle shots).
3) How successfully does your final product meet the brief? I think that our final product meets the brief successfully because we achieved the aim of showing continuity by using techniques like Match on action, shot/reverse shot and the 180 degree rule, and editing.
1) what techniques and codes did you use in your film and how do they influence the audiences understanding of the film?
In our film we used the 180-degree rule (that two characters must have the same right to left relationship) to help our audience to understand the action better, avoid confusion of the two characters, and keep our film looking professional. We used close ups and the faces to make the reactions clearer and to make the action more intense. We shot the girls close together and holding hands at the beginning of the film, but opposite each other and further away when they argue.
We used shot reverse shot when one character looked at another, and then we filmed from over the other characters shoulder to create the idea they were looking back at the other. This was also useful when we filmed different reactions of each character and could edit it to look like it was one shot.
We used Match on action when filming our characters walking through two double doors. First we filmed behind the characters and then in front of them as they entered through the doors. It was difficult to make this accurate, as everything had to be in the right place.
These three techniques help the film look continuous and make sense to the audience.
2) How did you use new technologies in your construction, planning and evaluation, and what skills do you have at using this technology?
When planning, we uploaded our story boards (through a scanner) to our blogs. Whilst constructing our Preliminary Filming Task we used digital cameras, which helped us look back at what we filmed and film over things.
We used non-linear editing software to cut scenes we didn’t want to use and blend our shots. This took a lot of practice but now we have gained more independence when using them.
We used YouTube and our blogs to upload the film.
We also developed the skills of using a steady (instead of shaky) camera and using a variety of different shot types (including practising high angle shots).
3) How successfully does your final product meet the brief? I think that our final product meets the brief successfully because we achieved the aim of showing continuity by using techniques like Match on action, shot/reverse shot and the 180 degree rule, and editing.
G322B working title film production research...
My Research into Working Title films
Working Title Films is a British film production company, based in London, England. The company was founded by Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in 1984. It produces feature films and some television productions. Eric Fellner and Bevan are the co-owners of the company now.
The company gained mainstream traction after the unexpected global box-office success of Hugh Grant-starrer, Four Weddings and a Funeral. Among the company's films are Richard Curtis-scripted romantic comedies, which usually star Grant, and Coen Brothers' films, but has in recent times moved into many other types of film, such as United 93.
In 2004 it made a profit of £17.8 million pounds. As of 2007, all its films are distributed by Universal Pictures, which owns a 67% stake in the company, and many of its recent films are co-productions with StudioCanal. The remaining shares are owned by the company's founders, BBC Films, and private investors.
The film company also has a smaller low-budget film brand, WT2 (Working Title 2) which has produced films such as Billy Elliot (2000) and Shaun of the Dead (2004).[1]
Recently the company produced Burn After Reading, a comedy starring Brad Pitt and George Clooney.
1991 ITV franchise bid
In 1991 Working Title was involved in a bid for the London weekend ITV licence. Mentorn, Palace, Polygram and Working Title wanted to take over from London Weekend Television and broadcast to London under the name London Independent Broadcasting. In the event LWT retained its licence; London Independent Broadcasting's proposals were deemed by the Independent Television Commission, which was overseeing the bid process, to fail the quality threshold.[2]
Working Title Films is a British film production company, based in London.
The company was founded by Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in the late eighties.
It is famous for its Richard Curtis scripted romantic comedies and Coen brothers films.
During the mid 1990s British film was boosted by the success of many Working Title comedies like The Borrowers, Bean, Four Weddings and a Funeral and Fargo.
In 1992 Working Title Films joined forces with PolyGram, and saw the departure of Sarah Radclyffe and the arrival of Eric Fellner as co-Chairman.
All its films are currently distributed by Universal Pictures, which owns a 67% stake in the company, and many of its recent films are co-productions with Studio Canal.
The remaining shares are owned by the company's founders, BBC Films and private investors.
In 2004 it made a profit of £17.8 million.
Since the turn of the century Working Title has been producing some of the biggest hits at the box office with films such as O Brother Where Art Thou?, Billy Elliot, Captain Corelli's Mandolin, Bridget Jones, Shaun of the Dead, Pride and Prejudice and Hot Fuzz. Working Title's Action! Training Program encourages future filmmakers by allowing 3 candidates with the opportunity to work in their London office.
Working Title Films is a British film production company, based in London, England. The company was founded by Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in 1984. It produces feature films and some television productions. Eric Fellner and Bevan are the co-owners of the company now.
The company gained mainstream traction after the unexpected global box-office success of Hugh Grant-starrer, Four Weddings and a Funeral. Among the company's films are Richard Curtis-scripted romantic comedies, which usually star Grant, and Coen Brothers' films, but has in recent times moved into many other types of film, such as United 93.
In 2004 it made a profit of £17.8 million pounds. As of 2007, all its films are distributed by Universal Pictures, which owns a 67% stake in the company, and many of its recent films are co-productions with StudioCanal. The remaining shares are owned by the company's founders, BBC Films, and private investors.
The film company also has a smaller low-budget film brand, WT2 (Working Title 2) which has produced films such as Billy Elliot (2000) and Shaun of the Dead (2004).[1]
Recently the company produced Burn After Reading, a comedy starring Brad Pitt and George Clooney.
1991 ITV franchise bid
In 1991 Working Title was involved in a bid for the London weekend ITV licence. Mentorn, Palace, Polygram and Working Title wanted to take over from London Weekend Television and broadcast to London under the name London Independent Broadcasting. In the event LWT retained its licence; London Independent Broadcasting's proposals were deemed by the Independent Television Commission, which was overseeing the bid process, to fail the quality threshold.[2]
Working Title Films is a British film production company, based in London.
The company was founded by Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in the late eighties.
It is famous for its Richard Curtis scripted romantic comedies and Coen brothers films.
During the mid 1990s British film was boosted by the success of many Working Title comedies like The Borrowers, Bean, Four Weddings and a Funeral and Fargo.
In 1992 Working Title Films joined forces with PolyGram, and saw the departure of Sarah Radclyffe and the arrival of Eric Fellner as co-Chairman.
All its films are currently distributed by Universal Pictures, which owns a 67% stake in the company, and many of its recent films are co-productions with Studio Canal.
The remaining shares are owned by the company's founders, BBC Films and private investors.
In 2004 it made a profit of £17.8 million.
Since the turn of the century Working Title has been producing some of the biggest hits at the box office with films such as O Brother Where Art Thou?, Billy Elliot, Captain Corelli's Mandolin, Bridget Jones, Shaun of the Dead, Pride and Prejudice and Hot Fuzz. Working Title's Action! Training Program encourages future filmmakers by allowing 3 candidates with the opportunity to work in their London office.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)